Added: Dec 4, 2008

From: robnmikerec

Duration: 1:0

kilzone 2 vs gears of war 2 in a toe to toe conflict that has been going on for monthsROBNMIKERECORDINGS..................

Channel: Games

Tags: 360  c-net  cog  descusions  gamespot  gears  grafhics  helghast  ign  isa  killzone  locarst  of  ps3  reveiws  vs  war  xbox 


Rating: 3.67 (3 ratings)    Views: 113    Comments: 24

la12muerta Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - gears of war 2, simply because of it's great multiplayer, great gameplay elements such as the innovative cover system. simply gears of war 2 is 2008's most anticipated games, the first one sold 5 million, and 2.2 million of that was in the first six weeks, the game was simply great with a few little errors, which are all taken out in gears of war 2.killzone 1 simply flopped, the graphics of killzone 2 are amazing, but that's where it ends, period. don't go randomly flaming me cause i'm right

la12muerta Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - correction: "gears of war 2 is 2008's most anticipated GAME. (not GAMES)i excuse myself for my mistake.greetz, La muerta

robnmikerec Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - great reponse send this video to your frends to see what they think :)

robtuk8313 Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - backing my 360 and gears of war to this day i still play, been waiting for the second since completing the storymode and unlocking all the achievements =], no im not a fanboy just love gears of war main reason for owning a 360, i think will sell more also because not igsactly sure but i think 360 sold more than ps3 =]

funksobruva Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - o wow killzone is going to pound the selfs next year ok gears of war may have great online play etc etc but killzone has been around longer than gears and will still live when gears eventully dies out. and the second gears is exacty the same as the first nothing major has changed and fuck all consoles that arnt made by sony because sony consoles are the best and sony has a much higher reputation that crappy microsofts xbox as my moto goes (FUK BILL GATES)

Vontese Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - Please no swearing, cursing or personal insults.. only opinions... i do personally think Killzone 2 will be better but i think they'll turn out as good as each other. Killzone 2 has better graphical textures.. better animations (hit response system) but gameplay cant be known til release..

Vontese Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - In terms of improvement, Killzone 2 has certainly improved gretly from Killzone 1, Gears 2 however not so much. However, because KZ1 wasnt THAT good, and Gears 1 was, this doesnt necessarily mean KZ2 is better than GeOW2. (GOW reserved for God of war [it came out first]). I dont mind if you disagree with my opinion, just no swearing or personal insults and that'll be dandy.. thanks.

ImBored1003 Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - Its between R2 and Gears 2 not K2 and Gears 2.

maltez92 Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - innovative cover system?There were identical cover systems before GearsKillzone 1 was incredible funKillzone 2 looks like leaps and bounds above everything elseGears 2 looks only a small step up from Gears 1Gears 2 will b almost as good as resistance 2Killzone 2 will make them both seem obsolete

la12muerta Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - i do agree with you, i just believe gears 2 will score better. the second game does look good. there simply is a big problem because the first killzone wasn't really good, that might scare lots of gamers away.

la12muerta Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - killzone was first? so? killzone 1 kind of really sucked so why whould killzone 2 make it all better, your the typical class A fanboy. gears of war 2 didn't change alot gameplay wise because it doesn't need improving. the game online and offline works perfect, killzone 1's gameplay features weren't really brilliant

la12muerta Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - there weren't identical cover systems before gears, your probably talking about GRAW and ainbow six. these sort of cover systems arent like gears of war's cover system, the gears of war cover system is called: "high speed covering" or "one button covering" it works better then GR and R6.for as killzone 1, you might liked it, but it really did fail quite a bit. it wasn't bad, but also not very good. gears of war 2 is simply the most logical answer, however K2 MIGHT be good if they improve on K1

Vontese Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - Wha..??? Killzone 2 is better than Resistance 2 if you think about it (in theory) but that's besides the point, GeOW2 shares the same blood, gore and grey as Killzone 2 but Resistance 2 and GeOW2 have nothing in common..

Vontese Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - yh i know what you mean.. but it certainly aint discouraged this gamer.. cause i alwayts thought Killzone 1 was bad.. i neglected to buy the game.. but this time around.. i've only found one problem, the dialogue is kinda weird sometimes.. and i've reeeaally been searching for problems...

funksobruva Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - haha resistance as a whole is even worse then killzone 1

ImBored1003 Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - I wouldnt say that...I have both consoles and I prefer Gears 2, but Resistance 2 will be a great game.

maltez92 Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - kill.switchred dead revolverthe godfather gameall these have identical to gears cover systemsalthough the best cover system in any game ive played is UnchartedIts very similar to gears but the blindfire is much easier to use, and the melee is not clumsy like gears so if an enemy does get close, you can easily take care of him

la12muerta Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - i had uncharted, i don't know about recent updates to the game, but the whole running against a wall instead of just pushing a button to slide at it doesn't feel right. it loses your sence of power over the game...allthough the cover system in uncharted was good, it wasn't great, like gears. uncharted was a good game though, i loved the nazi's turned into zombies and stuff.

maltez92 Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - In term of taking cover, I thought Gears was the same as uncharted. Just running around in uncharted was easier because of gears stupid camera angle. You could take cover from afar in uncharted by rolling into it, this is exactly the same as the sliding thing un gears.the reason i thought uncharted was better is because the camera isnt locked behind the character. this makes it a lot easier to get where you want to go, and makes melee attacks a lot less clumsy

la12muerta Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - you right about the camera, but your forgetting that uncharted isn't an actual shooter, it's more adventure, so you can't really compare it. still i feel the cover system in gears worked a bit faster (only if you didn't put on the fast movement option in uncharted) i did love how naughty dog tried to lengthen the uncharted gameplay with those unlockables and being able to play the game in mirror view and such.

maltez92 Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - well i know uncharted isnt a shooter game 100%but the main gameplay focus is on cover based shooting, with platforming and puzzles making up about 10% of the gameeven though its only 90% a shooter game, i felt the shooting in it was better than gearsthe fact that you are able to run and shoot people behind or to the side of you made the shooting much betteralso when enemies were close, engaging in melee was very easy, but in gears you had to rotate the camera around and position yourself

la12muerta Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - the platforming certainly does take more then 10 percent of the game, i've spent shitloads just jumping around and such. but the melee in uncharted is worked out different because you also have melee combo's (tributing to the platform feeling) and gears does not.

Vontese Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - where does Killzone 2 fit in, in all this?

la12muerta Says:

Dec 4, 2008 - it doesn't xD