Added: Dec 5, 2008

From: a01011399

Duration: 7:17

Creation VS evolution This is the opening video of a debate that I am having against an evolutionists, there is only one important rule:- We will only debate on one topic at the time, I will chose the first topic, and he will chose the next.This video is about the supposed human evolution; In the video I will refute all the supposed transitional forms.Basically I made one point in the video, MODERN HUMANS PREDATE THEIR SUPPOSED ANSESTORSSources1) A footprint from a modern human was dated to be at least 5 Million years old, (Much older than Lucy and any other supposed ancestor) http://www.javno.com/en/lifestyle/clanak.php?id=1523902) hundreds of man made artifacts and fossils that are much older than expected http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_forbiddenarcheology.htm (e-book)Summery http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/hiddenhistory/hiddenhistory13.htm* Ages of fossils assuming that dating methods are accurate.

Channel: Education

Tags: ape  creation  evolution  evolutionism  fossil  homo  human  lucy  transition  transitional 


Rating: 3.79 (14 ratings)    Views: 365    Comments: 14

sweatytoothmadman Says:

Dec 5, 2008 - Who are you debating?

a01011399 Says:

Dec 5, 2008 - ScientiaPerceptum

sweatytoothmadman Says:

Dec 5, 2008 - I looked up the website link you referenced for the man made artifacts and fossils and each example does not give a fossil number such as "Lucy"'s is AL 288-1. How can we verfy that any of these were ever dug up?

a01011399 Says:

Dec 5, 2008 - well how can we know that lucy was dug up? I have never seen her.no one denys that this fossils exist, and the links provide specific informaion on who found them, where and when. but not even talk origins deny that this fossils exists.besides this fossils are ignored and rejected in peer review, so maybe that is why they don´t have a clasification

kut77less Says:

Dec 5, 2008 - Like your video you made some good points

sweatytoothmadman Says:

Dec 5, 2008 - "Well how can we know that Lucy was dug up?" It was properly documented and catalogued not to mention the fossil does do tours to other museums. "Fossils are ignored and rejected in peer review" If the fossil was dug up by a paleontologist then the fossil would be catalogued regardless. "Rejected in peer review" Nor did they give the reason why they were rejected other than to pull the evolutionary conspiracy card or link to the original paper written.

a01011399 Says:

Dec 5, 2008 - these fossils exists, most of my sources came from a book, and the book has something like 30 pages of bibliografy, and provides specific information on who where and when was the fossil found.Talk orignis has an article refuting the book, and not even TO denys that this fossis exist.this fossils where found and/or analyced by scientists, do you really believe that they lied just to make fun of you?

a01011399 Says:

Dec 5, 2008 - the book was also writen by a scientists and he is not a creationist, the fact is that transitional fossils are not in the correct order, and human evolution is one of many examples, I will say that there is not even one transitional fossil in the correct order

EineKleineAtheist Says:

Dec 5, 2008 - I think your problem is that even though you've been proved wrong, you move along and use the same old arguments. Creationists never seem to realize how utterly wrong they are.

Yerizzo Says:

Dec 5, 2008 - If you believe in evolutionism yet don't believe in aliens then you're a big'o hippo (hipocrit)

6odJustin0 Says:

Dec 5, 2008 - Hey your accent doesn't sound much like that of a Mexican speaking english.So maybe you would have lied about your country and yet you claim not to be dishonest

a01011399 Says:

Dec 5, 2008 - I am not mexican, I was playing a joke to all youtubers

Bucketses Says:

Dec 5, 2008 - I find it curious how you apply enormous amounts of scrutiny and skepticism to things you disagree with, but so little if any to that which you believe even though your arguments can be used in the same manner against your beliefs. The "Have you seen it?" argument basically reduces truth to what you personally have seen, to this argument I right now do not exists as a human because you have never seen me.

6odJustin0 Says:

Dec 5, 2008 - Ok, you got me there hah... hah... hah... hah....hah....But what good did it for you now that everybody has owned your ass? hahahaha